Abstract

Author:

Marifel A. Ansama

Doi: 10.26480/seps.02.2025.92.94

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

This compliance strategy study of San Pablo Colleges Medical Center (SPCMC) aims to measure its adaptability to privacy regulations, to face challenges related to corporate policies, technology systems, employee mentoring, patient meetings, hazard administration, and regulatory submissiveness. Agreement with its privacy guidance, policies, and procedures’ efficacy, and power to administer data privacy menace is also assessed. To cover key topics like policy review updates, frequency, and its alignment with regulations, coaching effectiveness, innovation protection, and convalescent consultation practices, questionnaires were disseminated to participants from different selected sectors, such as management, information technology, legal, and health care. When results are gathered and analyzed, the weighted mean method is utilized to identify response patterns and compare differences between personnel members. Results show there is an indication of needed enhancement in education regularity and approach improvement. This also shows that the company’s security policies and guidelines are aligned, and patients’ data privacy is managed at a reasonable level. Nevertheless, a more comprehensive and constant coaching is needed. Analysis also shows a significant assurance that information confidentiality is achieved by using technology systems, although the real struggle lies in maintaining constant checkups and vulnerability detection. Adjustments to ever-changing rules are also a main difficulty. Likewise, the quality of staff training practices and rules revision can be seen as a zone of enhancement. To strengthen SPCMC’s privacy agenda, constant familiarization with regulation revision and technology evolutions is necessary, as data analysis shows (Kumar, 2009). These perceptions provided important guidance to implement techniques to enhance confidentiality, submissiveness, and the safeguarding of patients’ data.